Saturday, May 3, 2008

JUST LOOK AT THE HEADLINE OF THIS ARTICLE *stares*. AHYES. thats the reason why my mum has been complaining recently, & it all boils down to MONEYY. PRICE HIKES IN COMMODITIES have been the concern of the population these days.

Jian Wei has done a great job on analysing the reasons as to why there's been a rise in the price of staple foods globally. (go read if you haven't!) The above article is taken from 3 May 2008 Straits Times.

"The price of staple foods have been rising globally, driven by increasing demands from China and India and crop failures, among other things" (the first highlighted portion)

1. Significant increase in demand for staple foods from BIG countries (high population) like China and India.
- population boom as infant mortality rate decreases due to better healthcare facilities
- economic progress leads to a higher purchasing power of the population.
** this shifts the demand curve RIGHTWARDS!

2. Decrease in supply of staple foods
- adverse weather conditions destroy crops, leading to crop failure.
- increase in demand for biofuels (example, corn), leading to a decrease in availability of staple food for consumption.
** this shifts the supply curve LEFTWARDS!

====> simultaneous decrease in supply and increase in demand leads to PRICE HIKES!

lets read further.... ...


"....there were variations in prices across supermarkets, even for the same item..... their supermarkets cater to different segments of customers from locals to exptriates .......... "

This illustrates an example of price discrimination.
- there's two markets with different price elasticites of demand (comparing a supermarket located at Ang Mo Kio and one supermarket located at Raffles City)
-since demand for good is price elastic for a supermarket located at Ang Mo Kio, a lower price is charged
-on the other hand, demand for good is price inelastic for a supermarket located at Raffles City, a higher price is charged.


"Differential pricing of products is common among retailers worldwide as each store has to take into account operating costs and rentals"

This illustrates an example of price differentiation.
- higher rental and operating costs incurred for the supermarket located at Raffles City compared to the supermarket located at Ang Mo Kio.
- due to the difference in the cost of the goods sold, a different price would have to be charged in different locations.


i'm going to consult Mr How on whether or not my analysis on the part on the PRICE DISCRIMINATION and PRICE DIFFERENTIATION is right. yeahh. *fingers crossed* if there's really something wrong about the price discrimination vs price differentiation part, please feel free to drop your comments. thankyou.

shuhui :D

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Because the Econs Blog hates me, I haven't been able to post. But anyway, here's the video I posted in the other blog.

THIS IS THE EASY BEST WAY FOR PEOPLE TO KNOW BOUT OPPORTUNITY COST :D

♥ pearlynne

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

We want your Wanted


Please use your real name

Use your real name pls...

Is Monopoly Really Bad?

Hi Everyone,

Here's a video offering some interesting points about the good & bad about monopoly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdRGUaTHVig

So does the need to maintain its monopoly really force the monopolist to behave itself?

What exactly is a deadweight loss?

Cheers!
Jian Wei

Reasons for the Food Crisis today

Hi Everyone,

Below is an excerpt from the article "Rumblings of Social Unrest" by Lester R. Brown (President of the Earth Policy Institute) from The Straits Times 22/04/2008 (!Earth Day!), which I thought explained the reasons for the food crisis well:

"This chronically tight food supply is driven by the cumulative effect of several trends that are affecting both global and demand and supply.

"On the demand side, the trends include the continuing addition of 70 million people per year to the world's population, the desire of some four billion people to move up the food-chain and consume more grain-intensive livestock products as well as the sharp acceleration in the use of grain to produce ethanol for cars in the United States.

"Since 2005, this last source of demand has raised the annual growth in world grain consumption from 20 million tonnes to 50 million tonnes.

"Meanwhile, on the supply side, there is little new land to be brought under the plough unless it comes from clearing tropical rainforests in the Amazon and congo basins and in Indonesia, or from clearing land in the Brazilian cerrado, a savannah-like region south of the Amazon rainforest.

"Unfortunately, this has heavy environmental costs: the release of sequestered carbon, the loss of plant and animal species as well as increased rainfall runoff and soil erosion. And in scores of countries, prime cropland is being lost to industrial and residential construction and to the paving of land for roads, highways and parking lots.

"New sources of irrigation are even more scarce than new land to plough. During the last half of the 20th century, the world's irrigated area nearly tripled, expanding from 94 million ha in 1950 to 276 million ha in 2000. In the years since, there has been little, if any, growth. So irrigated area per perosn is shrinking by 1 per cent a year.

"Meanwhile, the backlog of agricultural technology that can be used to raise cropland productivity is dwindling. Between 1950 and 1990 the world's farmers raised granland productivity by 2.1 per cent a year. But from 1990 until 2007 this growth rate slowed to 1.2 per cent a year. And the rising price of oil is boosting teh costs of both food production and transport while at teh same time making it more profitable to convert grain into fuel for cars.

"Beyond this, climate change presents new risks. Crop-withering heatwaves, more destructive storms and the melting of teh Asian mountain glaciers that sustain the dry-season flow of that region's major rivers are combining to make harvest expansion more difficult.

"In the past, the negative effects of unusual weather events was always temporary; within a year or two things would return to normal. But with teh climate in flux, there is no norm to return to.

"The collective effect of these trends makes it more and more difficult for farmers to keep pace with the growth in demand."


In summary, here are the following points for changes in demand and supply for grains:

- Demand for grains has increased/the demand curve for grains experienced a rightward shift
This is mainly due to:
1. Increase in global population
> 70 million people are added to the world population each year
> With more people, comes more demand for food (especially grains, a staple food)

2. Growing affluence in economic juggernauts China & India
> Around 4 billion people from China & India who've been lifted from poverty, are demanding to consume more livestock
> This increased demand for livestock drives up prices for livestock, which in turn increases the supply of livestock
> However, as livestock such as pigs consume grains too, the increased livestock production means that more grains have to be diverted to feeding these livestock
> This contributes to an increase in the demand for grains to feed those livestock (this can also be looked at as a "supply side" reason coz' the grains are diverted to feeding those livestock instead of feeding humans, thus reducing grain supply for us)

3. Rising cost of fuel
> With the cost of fuel soaring in the past several months, demand for bio-fuels have risen
> This has resulted in higher demand for ethanol (commonly used as bio-fuel)
> Increased demand for ethanol results in increased demand for grains, which is used to produce ethanol

Therefore demand for grains has risen.

- Supply for grains has decreased/the demand curve for grains experienced a leftward shift
This is mainly due to:
1. Climate Change
> Crop-withering heatwaves, more-destructive storms and the melting of Asian mountain glaciers that sustain the dry-season flow of the region's major rivers affect harvests
> Reduces grain supply

2. Rising cost of fuel
> With increased food production and transport costs due to increased fuel costs, it is more profitable to convert grain into fuel for cars
> Many farmers, especially in the United States, have turned to using their grains to produce ethanol
> This means less grains for human consumption

3. Low availability of new farmlands
> Little new land to be brought under the plough unless this means clearing forests & plains, which will negatively impact the environment
> This is coupled by the fact that there is little/no growth in the world's irrigated area as new sources of irrigation are even more scarce
> These contributes in restricting efforts to increase grain supply

Therefore supply of grains has decreased as a whole.

In conclusion, the simultaneous increase in demand and decrease in supply results in a higher equilibrium price for grains, resulting in today's food crisis.

Side note: With increased prices for grains + decreased grains supply, it is ultimately the lower income groups around the world that will be heavily disadvantaged as a result - which can (and has in many places) lead to social unrest over food.


Cheers, =)
Jian Wei

U.S. Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis [Simplified]

Hi Everyone,
For the past few months you would’ve heard loads of reports in the news saying that the world is experiencing a recession/will experience a recession this year, and these words: sub-prime loans, credit crunch, and housing bubble.

So, what’s the buzz about?

Basically, this is what I think it’s all about:

A U.S. housing bubble began in 2001 (a bubble is an economic situation in which there is a high volume of trade of a certain good at prices much higher than what it is usually worth) after the dot.com bust (you can read up on it), and it all seemed as if the U.S. economy was doing well and better.

Wanting to do their part in boosting the economy, U.S. banks began lending money to more and more people who would otherwise not have met bank loan requirements in the past, to encourage consumerism. Such lending of money to not-so-credible people (they may have adverse financial situations and may not be able to return the money/have poor credit histories) is known as sub-prime lending. Many of the people who got the sub-prime loans used it as mortgages to participate in the housing bubble (more of a “boom” as it was known then).

Unfortunately, in 2007 last year, the housing bubble burst and housing prices plunged. Many investors lost their money, including (yep you guessed it), those sub-prime borrowers. This means many of them cannot return their loans to the banks! So, indirectly, the banks made a huge loss. In response, banks reduced their lending activity, something which we call a “credit-crunch”, or started charging higher interest rates for their loans. This makes it more difficult for businesses/consumers to get the loan they require, placing a downward pressure on the economy.

Subsequently (won’t go into the details – in fact I’m still trying to comprehend it), this had a negative impact on the wider economy and as many important economies in the world (eg. Japan, EU, China etc.) have close economic links with the U.S. economy, there is a widespread fear that the “crisis” in the U.S. may adversely affect the global economy.

Someone once said “When the U.S. economy sneezes; the rest of the world catches a cold.” While we’ll not explore how accuracy of this statement in today’s world, I hope what I’ve written above can give a rough idea of what’s happening.

Please do feel free to comment/improve on what I’ve written above – after all I’ve only been exposed to Economics for less than half a year…

Cheerio =)
Jian wei